THERMOHAMMER Get the app

HONOR X7b vs OBLUE A101

Android

HONOR X7b

84.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

OBLUE A101

87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load

84.9% against 87.6% of full speed

Under sustained load

OBLUE A101 keeps 87.6% of its speed, HONOR X7b 84.9%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
HONOR X7b 84.9% OBLUE A101 87.6%
Throughput over time: HONOR X7b against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: HONOR X7b against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
HONOR X7bMeasureOBLUE A101
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
0.42 GIPSFastest sample2.43 GIPS
0.37 GIPSSecond-half average2.11 GIPS
61%Lowest 5-second average80%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

HONOR X7bMeasureOBLUE A101
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 14OSAndroid 16

HONOR X7b OBLUE A101

More matchups

HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad (A16)85.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPhone 12 Pro Max84.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store