THERMOHAMMER Get the app

HONOR X7b vs Xiaomi Pad 6

Android

HONOR X7b

84.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

84.9% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, HONOR X7b 84.9%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
HONOR X7b 84.9% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: HONOR X7b against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: HONOR X7b against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
HONOR X7bMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
0.42 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
0.37 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
61%Lowest 5-second average81%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

HONOR X7bMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 14OSAndroid 14

HONOR X7b Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad (A16)85.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPhone 12 Pro Max84.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store