THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad (9th generation) vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

iOS

iPad (9th generation)

76.9%speed held · 15 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) · Mali-G1-Ultra MC12

69.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load

76.9% against 69.2% of full speed · different test settings, see below

Under sustained load

iPad (9th generation) keeps 76.9% of its speed, Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) 69.2%. The runs used different settings (15 min · multi-thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
Throughput over time: iPad (9th generation) against Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)25%50%75%100%0:005:0010:0015:00Throughput over time: iPad (9th generation) against Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)25%50%75%100%0:005:0010:0015:00
iPad (9th generation)MeasureVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
15 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.15 GIPSFastest sample1.44 GIPS
0.88 GIPSSecond-half average1.08 GIPS
45%Lowest 5-second average63%
NominalHottest state reportedSerious

The devices

iPad (9th generation)MeasureVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
iOSPlatformAndroid
–ChipDimensity 9500 (MT6993)
–GPUMali-G1-Ultra MC12
iOS 27.2OSAndroid 17

iPad (9th generation) Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store