iPad (9th generation) vs Xiaomi Pad 6
iOS
iPad (9th generation)
76.9%speed held · 15 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Xiaomi Pad 6
88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadXiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load
76.9% against 88.2% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, iPad (9th generation) 76.9%. The runs used different settings (15 min · multi-thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPad (9th generation) | Measure | Xiaomi Pad 6 |
|---|---|---|
| 15 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 1.15 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.70 GIPS |
| 0.88 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.62 GIPS |
| 45% | Lowest 5-second average | 81% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPad (9th generation) | Measure | Xiaomi Pad 6 |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.2 | OS | Android 14 |
More matchups
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPhone SE (2nd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)92.2%
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
OBLUE A10187.6%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.