THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad (A16) vs iPad mini (6th generation)

iOS

iPad (A16)

85.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
iOS

iPad mini (6th generation)

88.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load

85.4% against 88.4% of full speed

Under sustained load

iPad mini (6th generation) keeps 88.4% of its speed, iPad (A16) 85.4%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPad (A16) 85.4% iPad mini (6th generation) 88.4%
Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against iPad mini (6th generation)25%50%75%100%0:005:00Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against iPad mini (6th generation)25%50%75%100%0:005:00
iPad (A16)MeasureiPad mini (6th generation)
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.61 GIPSFastest sample1.67 GIPS
1.38 GIPSSecond-half average1.53 GIPS
82%Lowest 5-second average77%
NominalHottest state reportedFair

The devices

iPad (A16)MeasureiPad mini (6th generation)
iOSPlatformiOS
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6OSiOS 27.2

iPad (A16) iPad mini (6th generation)

More matchups

iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad (A16)85.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store