THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad (A16) vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)

iOS

iPad (A16)

85.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
iOS

iPhone SE (3rd Gen)

74.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPad (A16) holds its speed better under sustained load

85.4% against 74.3% of full speed

Under sustained load

iPad (A16) keeps 85.4% of its speed, iPhone SE (3rd Gen) 74.3%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPad (A16) 85.4% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) 74.3%
Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against iPhone SE (3rd Gen)25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against iPhone SE (3rd Gen)25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPad (A16)MeasureiPhone SE (3rd Gen)
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.61 GIPSFastest sample1.56 GIPS
1.38 GIPSSecond-half average1.16 GIPS
82%Lowest 5-second average73%
NominalHottest state reportedFair

The devices

iPad (A16)MeasureiPhone SE (3rd Gen)
iOSPlatformiOS
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6OSiOS 27.0

iPad (A16) iPhone SE (3rd Gen)

More matchups

iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad (A16)85.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 16e73.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store