THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad (A16) vs OBLUE A101

iOS

iPad (A16)

85.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

OBLUE A101

87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load

85.4% against 87.6% of full speed

Under sustained load

OBLUE A101 keeps 87.6% of its speed, iPad (A16) 85.4%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPad (A16) 85.4% OBLUE A101 87.6%
Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPad (A16)MeasureOBLUE A101
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.61 GIPSFastest sample2.43 GIPS
1.38 GIPSSecond-half average2.11 GIPS
82%Lowest 5-second average80%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPad (A16)MeasureOBLUE A101
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6OSAndroid 16

iPad (A16) OBLUE A101

More matchups

iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad (A16)85.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store