THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad (A16) vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

iOS

iPad (A16)

85.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) · Mali-G1-Ultra MC12

69.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPad (A16) holds its speed better under sustained load

85.4% against 69.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

iPad (A16) keeps 85.4% of its speed, Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) 69.2%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPad (A16) 85.4% Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) 69.2%
Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPad (A16)MeasureVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.61 GIPSFastest sample1.44 GIPS
1.38 GIPSSecond-half average1.08 GIPS
82%Lowest 5-second average63%
NominalHottest state reportedSerious

The devices

iPad (A16)MeasureVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
iOSPlatformAndroid
–ChipDimensity 9500 (MT6993)
–GPUMali-G1-Ultra MC12
iOS 26.6OSAndroid 17

iPad (A16) Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

More matchups

iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad (A16)85.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132 vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322 Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 18% higher overall HONOR 600 Pro49,080 vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322 HONOR 600 Pro scores 22% higher overall

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store