THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad (A16) vs Xiaomi Pad 6

iOS

iPad (A16)

85.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

85.4% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, iPad (A16) 85.4%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPad (A16) 85.4% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPad (A16)MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.61 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
1.38 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
82%Lowest 5-second average81%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPad (A16)MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6OSAndroid 14

iPad (A16) Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad (A16)85.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store