THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad mini (5th generation) vs OBLUE A101

iOS

iPad mini (5th generation)

84.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

OBLUE A101

87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load

84.6% against 87.6% of full speed

Under sustained load

OBLUE A101 keeps 87.6% of its speed, iPad mini (5th generation) 84.6%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPad mini (5th generation) 84.6% OBLUE A101 87.6%
Throughput over time: iPad mini (5th generation) against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPad mini (5th generation) against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPad mini (5th generation)MeasureOBLUE A101
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.02 GIPSFastest sample2.43 GIPS
0.86 GIPSSecond-half average2.11 GIPS
80%Lowest 5-second average80%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPad mini (5th generation)MeasureOBLUE A101
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.5.2OSAndroid 16

iPad mini (5th generation) OBLUE A101

More matchups

iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% vs iPhone 12 Pro Max84.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% iPhone 16 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store