iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation) vs OBLUE A101
iOS
iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)
80.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
OBLUE A101
87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadOBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load
80.9% against 87.6% of full speed
Under sustained load
OBLUE A101 keeps 87.6% of its speed, iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation) 80.9%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation) | Measure | OBLUE A101 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 2.77 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.43 GIPS |
| 2.24 GIPS | Second-half average | 2.11 GIPS |
| 76% | Lowest 5-second average | 80% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation) | Measure | OBLUE A101 |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.0.1 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)80.9%
vs
iPhone 14 Pro Max80.8%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)80.9%
vs
iPhone 14 Pro81.3%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)80.9%
vs
iPhone 1480.1%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)80.9%
vs
iPhone 1679.9%
iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
OBLUE A10187.6%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OBLUE A10187.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.