iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)
iOS
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)
92.2%speed held · 30 min · multi-threadVS
iOS
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)
74.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadiPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
92.2% against 74.3% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) keeps 92.2% of its speed, iPhone SE (3rd Gen) 74.3%. The runs used different settings (30 min · multi-thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) | Measure | iPhone SE (3rd Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| 30 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 2.78 GIPS | Fastest sample | 1.56 GIPS |
| 2.57 GIPS | Second-half average | 1.16 GIPS |
| 89% | Lowest 5-second average | 73% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Fair |
The devices
| iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) | Measure | iPhone SE (3rd Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | iOS |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.0 | OS | iOS 27.0 |
More matchups
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)92.2%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)92.2%
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)92.2%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)92.2%
vs
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.