THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

iOS

iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)

92.2%speed held · 30 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) · Mali-G1-Ultra MC12

69.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) holds its speed better under sustained load

92.2% against 69.2% of full speed · different test settings, see below

Under sustained load

iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) keeps 92.2% of its speed, Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) 69.2%. The runs used different settings (30 min · multi-thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
Throughput over time: iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) against Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)25%50%75%100%0:0010:0020:0030:00Throughput over time: iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) against Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)25%50%75%100%0:0010:0020:0030:00
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)MeasureVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
30 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.78 GIPSFastest sample1.44 GIPS
2.57 GIPSSecond-half average1.08 GIPS
89%Lowest 5-second average63%
NominalHottest state reportedSerious

The devices

iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)MeasureVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
iOSPlatformAndroid
–ChipDimensity 9500 (MT6993)
–GPUMali-G1-Ultra MC12
iOS 27.0OSAndroid 17

iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store