THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 11 vs Xiaomi Pad 6

iOS

iPhone 11

77.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

77.5% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, iPhone 11 77.5%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 11 77.5% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: iPhone 11 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 11 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 11MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.20 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
0.93 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
65%Lowest 5-second average81%
SeriousHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 11MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.0OSAndroid 14

iPhone 11 Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPhone 1177.5% vs iPhone 1577.3% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1177.5% vs Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1177.5% vs iPhone 12 mini78.0% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1177.5% vs iPhone XR79.8% iPhone XR holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store