THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 12 mini vs Xiaomi Pad 6

iOS

iPhone 12 mini

78.0%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

78.0% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, iPhone 12 mini 78.0%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 12 mini 78.0% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: iPhone 12 mini against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 12 mini against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 12 miniMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.45 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
1.13 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
75%Lowest 5-second average81%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 12 miniMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.0OSAndroid 14

iPhone 12 mini Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPhone 12 mini78.0% vs Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1177.5% vs iPhone 12 mini78.0% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 12 mini78.0% vs iPhone 1577.3% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 12 mini78.0% vs iPhone XR79.8% iPhone XR holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store