THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 13 mini vs Xiaomi Pad 6

iOS

iPhone 13 mini

73.0%speed held · 15 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

73.0% against 88.2% of full speed · different test settings, see below

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, iPhone 13 mini 73.0%. The runs used different settings (15 min · multi-thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 13 mini 73.0% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: iPhone 13 mini against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:005:0010:0015:00Throughput over time: iPhone 13 mini against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:005:0010:0015:00
iPhone 13 miniMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
15 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.73 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
1.26 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
68%Lowest 5-second average81%
SeriousHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 13 miniMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6.1OSAndroid 14

iPhone 13 mini Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPhone 13 mini73.0% vs iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7% iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load iPad (9th generation)76.9% vs iPhone 13 mini73.0% iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 13 mini73.0% vs iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1% iPhone SE (2nd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)92.2% vs iPhone 13 mini73.0% iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store