THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 13 vs Xiaomi Pad 6

iOS

iPhone 13

94.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPhone 13 holds its speed better under sustained load

94.7% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

iPhone 13 keeps 94.7% of its speed, Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 13 94.7% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: iPhone 13 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 13 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 13MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.24 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
1.17 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
87%Lowest 5-second average81%
SeriousHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 13MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.7OSAndroid 14

iPhone 13 Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPhone 1394.7% vs motorola edge 6095.1% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1291.0% vs iPhone 1394.7% iPhone 13 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1394.7% vs OPPO A5389.9% iPhone 13 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs iPhone 1394.7% iPhone 13 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store