THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 14 Pro vs OBLUE A101

iOS

iPhone 14 Pro

81.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

OBLUE A101

87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load

81.3% against 87.6% of full speed

Under sustained load

OBLUE A101 keeps 87.6% of its speed, iPhone 14 Pro 81.3%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 14 Pro 81.3% OBLUE A101 87.6%
Throughput over time: iPhone 14 Pro against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 14 Pro against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 14 ProMeasureOBLUE A101
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.88 GIPSFastest sample2.43 GIPS
1.53 GIPSSecond-half average2.11 GIPS
77%Lowest 5-second average80%
SeriousHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 14 ProMeasureOBLUE A101
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.0.1OSAndroid 16

iPhone 14 Pro OBLUE A101

More matchups

iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)80.9% vs iPhone 14 Pro81.3% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 14 Pro81.3% vs iPhone 14 Pro Max80.8% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 14 Pro81.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3% Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1480.1% vs iPhone 14 Pro81.3% iPhone 14 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store