iPhone 14 Pro vs Xiaomi Pad 6
iOS
iPhone 14 Pro
81.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Xiaomi Pad 6
88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadXiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load
81.3% against 88.2% of full speed
Under sustained load
Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, iPhone 14 Pro 81.3%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 14 Pro | Measure | Xiaomi Pad 6 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 1.88 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.70 GIPS |
| 1.53 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.62 GIPS |
| 77% | Lowest 5-second average | 81% |
| Serious | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPhone 14 Pro | Measure | Xiaomi Pad 6 |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.0.1 | OS | Android 14 |
More matchups
iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)80.9%
vs
iPhone 14 Pro81.3%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 14 Pro81.3%
vs
iPhone 14 Pro Max80.8%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 14 Pro81.3%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3%
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 1480.1%
vs
iPhone 14 Pro81.3%
iPhone 14 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
OBLUE A10187.6%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.