iPhone 15 Pro Max vs OBLUE A101
iOS
iPhone 15 Pro Max
82.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
OBLUE A101
87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadOBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load
82.5% against 87.6% of full speed
Under sustained load
OBLUE A101 keeps 87.6% of its speed, iPhone 15 Pro Max 82.5%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 15 Pro Max | Measure | OBLUE A101 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 1.90 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.43 GIPS |
| 1.57 GIPS | Second-half average | 2.11 GIPS |
| 79% | Lowest 5-second average | 80% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPhone 15 Pro Max | Measure | OBLUE A101 |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 26.6.1 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPhone 15 Pro Max82.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 14 Pro81.3%
vs
iPhone 15 Pro Max82.5%
iPhone 15 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)80.9%
vs
iPhone 15 Pro Max82.5%
iPhone 15 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 14 Pro Max80.8%
vs
iPhone 15 Pro Max82.5%
iPhone 15 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
OBLUE A10187.6%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OBLUE A10187.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.