THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Xiaomi Pad 6

iOS

iPhone 15 Pro Max

82.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

82.5% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, iPhone 15 Pro Max 82.5%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 15 Pro Max 82.5% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: iPhone 15 Pro Max against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 15 Pro Max against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 15 Pro MaxMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.90 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
1.57 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
79%Lowest 5-second average81%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 15 Pro MaxMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6.1OSAndroid 14

iPhone 15 Pro Max Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPhone 15 Pro Max82.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 14 Pro81.3% vs iPhone 15 Pro Max82.5% iPhone 15 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)80.9% vs iPhone 15 Pro Max82.5% iPhone 15 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 14 Pro Max80.8% vs iPhone 15 Pro Max82.5% iPhone 15 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store