iPhone 15 vs OBLUE A101
iOS
iPhone 15
77.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
OBLUE A101
87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadOBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load
77.3% against 87.6% of full speed
Under sustained load
OBLUE A101 keeps 87.6% of its speed, iPhone 15 77.3%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 15 | Measure | OBLUE A101 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 1.82 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.43 GIPS |
| 1.41 GIPS | Second-half average | 2.11 GIPS |
| 76% | Lowest 5-second average | 80% |
| Serious | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPhone 15 | Measure | OBLUE A101 |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.0.1 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPhone 1177.5%
vs
iPhone 1577.3%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 1577.3%
vs
Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 12 mini78.0%
vs
iPhone 1577.3%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 1577.3%
vs
iPhone XR79.8%
iPhone XR holds its speed better under sustained load
OBLUE A10187.6%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OBLUE A10187.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.