THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 15 vs Xiaomi Pad 6

iOS

iPhone 15

77.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

77.3% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, iPhone 15 77.3%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 15 77.3% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: iPhone 15 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 15 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 15MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.82 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
1.41 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
76%Lowest 5-second average81%
SeriousHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 15MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.0.1OSAndroid 14

iPhone 15 Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPhone 1177.5% vs iPhone 1577.3% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1577.3% vs Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 12 mini78.0% vs iPhone 1577.3% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1577.3% vs iPhone XR79.8% iPhone XR holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store