THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 16 Pro vs Xiaomi Pad 6

iOS

iPhone 16 Pro

85.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

85.5% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, iPhone 16 Pro 85.5%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 16 Pro 85.5% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: iPhone 16 Pro against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 16 Pro against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 16 ProMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.23 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
1.91 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
80%Lowest 5-second average81%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 16 ProMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.0OSAndroid 14

iPhone 16 Pro Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% iPhone 16 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store