THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 16 vs OBLUE A101

iOS

iPhone 16

79.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

OBLUE A101

87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load

79.9% against 87.6% of full speed

Under sustained load

OBLUE A101 keeps 87.6% of its speed, iPhone 16 79.9%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 16 79.9% OBLUE A101 87.6%
Throughput over time: iPhone 16 against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 16 against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 16MeasureOBLUE A101
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.17 GIPSFastest sample2.43 GIPS
1.73 GIPSSecond-half average2.11 GIPS
79%Lowest 5-second average80%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 16MeasureOBLUE A101
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.0OSAndroid 16

iPhone 16 OBLUE A101

More matchups

iPhone 1679.9% vs iPhone XR79.8% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1480.1% vs iPhone 1679.9% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 14 Pro Max80.8% vs iPhone 1679.9% iPhone 14 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)80.9% vs iPhone 1679.9% iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store