THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 16 vs Xiaomi Pad 6

iOS

iPhone 16

79.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

79.9% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, iPhone 16 79.9%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 16 79.9% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: iPhone 16 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 16 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 16MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.17 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
1.73 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
79%Lowest 5-second average81%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 16MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.0OSAndroid 14

iPhone 16 Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPhone 1679.9% vs iPhone XR79.8% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1480.1% vs iPhone 1679.9% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 14 Pro Max80.8% vs iPhone 1679.9% iPhone 14 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)80.9% vs iPhone 1679.9% iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store