iPhone 16e vs iPhone 17 Pro Max
iOS
iPhone 16e
73.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
iOS
iPhone 17 Pro Max
75.7%speed held · 15 min · multi-threadiPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
73.5% against 75.7% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
iPhone 17 Pro Max keeps 75.7% of its speed, iPhone 16e 73.5%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 15 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 16e | Measure | iPhone 17 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 15 min · multi-thread |
| 2.00 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.19 GIPS |
| 1.47 GIPS | Second-half average | 1.66 GIPS |
| 72% | Lowest 5-second average | 70% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| iPhone 16e | Measure | iPhone 17 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | iOS |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 26.6.1 | OS | iOS 27.0 |
More matchups
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 572.5%
vs
iPhone 16e73.5%
iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 1577.3%
vs
iPhone 16e73.5%
iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.