iPhone 16e vs iPhone SE (2nd Gen)
iOS
iPhone 16e
73.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
iOS
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)
84.1%speed held · 30 min · multi-threadiPhone SE (2nd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
73.5% against 84.1% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
iPhone SE (2nd Gen) keeps 84.1% of its speed, iPhone 16e 73.5%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 30 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 16e | Measure | iPhone SE (2nd Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 30 min · multi-thread |
| 2.00 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.81 GIPS |
| 1.47 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.68 GIPS |
| 72% | Lowest 5-second average | 35% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPhone 16e | Measure | iPhone SE (2nd Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | iOS |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 26.6.1 | OS | iOS 26.6 |
More matchups
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 572.5%
vs
iPhone 16e73.5%
iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 1577.3%
vs
iPhone 16e73.5%
iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPhone SE (2nd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)92.2%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.