iPhone 16e vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
iOS
iPhone 16e
73.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
7.5%speed held · 5 min · 1 threadiPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load
73.5% against 7.5% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
iPhone 16e keeps 73.5% of its speed, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite 7.5%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 5 min · 1 thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 16e | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · 1 thread |
| 2.00 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.86 GIPS |
| 1.47 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.21 GIPS |
| 72% | Lowest 5-second average | 3% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| iPhone 16e | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 26.6.1 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 572.5%
vs
iPhone 16e73.5%
iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 1577.3%
vs
iPhone 16e73.5%
iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.