THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 16e vs Xiaomi Mi 10T

iOS

iPhone 16e

73.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Mi 10T

77.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Mi 10T holds its speed better under sustained load

73.5% against 77.9% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Mi 10T keeps 77.9% of its speed, iPhone 16e 73.5%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 16e 73.5% Xiaomi Mi 10T 77.9%
Throughput over time: iPhone 16e against Xiaomi Mi 10T25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 16e against Xiaomi Mi 10T25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 16eMeasureXiaomi Mi 10T
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.00 GIPSFastest sample1.07 GIPS
1.47 GIPSSecond-half average0.85 GIPS
72%Lowest 5-second average68%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 16eMeasureXiaomi Mi 10T
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6.1OSAndroid 12

iPhone 16e Xiaomi Mi 10T

More matchups

iPhone 16e73.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 572.5% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 16e73.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1577.3% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 12 mini78.0% vs Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1177.5% vs Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store