THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 16e vs Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G

iOS

iPhone 16e

73.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G

82.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G holds its speed better under sustained load

73.5% against 82.3% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G keeps 82.3% of its speed, iPhone 16e 73.5%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 16e 73.5% Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G 82.3%
Throughput over time: iPhone 16e against Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 16e against Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 16eMeasureXiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.00 GIPSFastest sample1.18 GIPS
1.47 GIPSSecond-half average0.97 GIPS
72%Lowest 5-second average79%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 16eMeasureXiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6.1OSAndroid 16

iPhone 16e Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G

More matchups

iPhone 16e73.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 572.5% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 16e73.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1577.3% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 15 Pro Max82.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 14 Pro81.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3% Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store