iPhone 17 Pro Max vs OBLUE A101
iOS
iPhone 17 Pro Max
75.7%speed held · 15 min · multi-threadVS
Android
OBLUE A101
87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadOBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load
75.7% against 87.6% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
OBLUE A101 keeps 87.6% of its speed, iPhone 17 Pro Max 75.7%. The runs used different settings (15 min · multi-thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 17 Pro Max | Measure | OBLUE A101 |
|---|---|---|
| 15 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 2.19 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.43 GIPS |
| 1.66 GIPS | Second-half average | 2.11 GIPS |
| 70% | Lowest 5-second average | 80% |
| Serious | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPhone 17 Pro Max | Measure | OBLUE A101 |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.0 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPhone SE (2nd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)92.2%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
OBLUE A10187.6%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OBLUE A10187.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.