iPhone SE (2nd Gen) vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
iOS
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)
84.1%speed held · 30 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) · Mali-G1-Ultra MC12
69.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadiPhone SE (2nd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
84.1% against 69.2% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
iPhone SE (2nd Gen) keeps 84.1% of its speed, Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) 69.2%. The runs used different settings (30 min · multi-thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone SE (2nd Gen) | Measure | Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| 30 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 0.81 GIPS | Fastest sample | 1.44 GIPS |
| 0.68 GIPS | Second-half average | 1.08 GIPS |
| 35% | Lowest 5-second average | 63% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| iPhone SE (2nd Gen) | Measure | Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) |
| – | GPU | Mali-G1-Ultra MC12 |
| iOS 26.6 | OS | Android 17 |
More matchups
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPhone SE (2nd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)92.2%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPhone SE (2nd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPhone SE (2nd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 18% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
HONOR 600 Pro scores 22% higher overall
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.