iPhone SE (2nd Gen) vs Xiaomi Pad 6
iOS
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)
84.1%speed held · 30 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Xiaomi Pad 6
88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadXiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load
84.1% against 88.2% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, iPhone SE (2nd Gen) 84.1%. The runs used different settings (30 min · multi-thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone SE (2nd Gen) | Measure | Xiaomi Pad 6 |
|---|---|---|
| 30 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 0.81 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.70 GIPS |
| 0.68 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.62 GIPS |
| 35% | Lowest 5-second average | 81% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPhone SE (2nd Gen) | Measure | Xiaomi Pad 6 |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 26.6 | OS | Android 14 |
More matchups
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPhone SE (2nd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)92.2%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPhone SE (2nd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPhone SE (2nd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
OBLUE A10187.6%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.