iPhone SE (3rd Gen) vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
iOS
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)
74.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
7.5%speed held · 5 min · 1 threadiPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
74.3% against 7.5% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) keeps 74.3% of its speed, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite 7.5%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 5 min · 1 thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone SE (3rd Gen) | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · 1 thread |
| 1.56 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.86 GIPS |
| 1.16 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.21 GIPS |
| 73% | Lowest 5-second average | 3% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| iPhone SE (3rd Gen) | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.0 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 572.5%
vs
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 1577.3%
vs
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.