iPhone XR vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
iOS
iPhone XR
79.8%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) · Mali-G1-Ultra MC12
69.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadiPhone XR holds its speed better under sustained load
79.8% against 69.2% of full speed
Under sustained load
iPhone XR keeps 79.8% of its speed, Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) 69.2%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone XR | Measure | Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 1.03 GIPS | Fastest sample | 1.44 GIPS |
| 0.82 GIPS | Second-half average | 1.08 GIPS |
| 75% | Lowest 5-second average | 63% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| iPhone XR | Measure | Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) |
| – | GPU | Mali-G1-Ultra MC12 |
| iOS 18.7.9 | OS | Android 17 |
More matchups
iPhone 1679.9%
vs
iPhone XR79.8%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 1480.1%
vs
iPhone XR79.8%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 14 Pro Max80.8%
vs
iPhone XR79.8%
iPhone 14 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)80.9%
vs
iPhone XR79.8%
iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 18% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
HONOR 600 Pro scores 22% higher overall
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.