THERMOHAMMER Get the app

Nothing Phone (3a) Lite vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

Android

Nothing Phone (3a) Lite

7.5%speed held · 5 min · 1 thread
VS
Android

Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) · Mali-G1-Ultra MC12

69.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load

7.5% against 69.2% of full speed · different test settings, see below

Under sustained load

Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) keeps 69.2% of its speed, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite 7.5%. The runs used different settings (5 min · 1 thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
Throughput over time: Nothing Phone (3a) Lite against Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: Nothing Phone (3a) Lite against Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
Nothing Phone (3a) LiteMeasureVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
5 min · 1 threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.86 GIPSFastest sample1.44 GIPS
0.21 GIPSSecond-half average1.08 GIPS
3%Lowest 5-second average63%
SeriousHottest state reportedSerious

The devices

Nothing Phone (3a) LiteMeasureVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–ChipDimensity 9500 (MT6993)
–GPUMali-G1-Ultra MC12
Android 16OSAndroid 17

Nothing Phone (3a) Lite Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store