Nothing Phone (3a) Lite vs Xiaomi Pad 6

Android

Nothing Phone (3a) Lite

7.5%speed held · 5 min · 1 thread

Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

7.5% against 88.2% of full speed · different test settings, see below

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite 7.5%. The runs used different settings (5 min · 1 thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time

Nothing Phone (3a) Lite 7.5% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%

Nothing Phone (3a) Lite	Measure	Xiaomi Pad 6
5 min · 1 thread	Test	5 min · multi-thread
2.86 GIPS	Fastest sample	0.70 GIPS
0.21 GIPS	Second-half average	0.62 GIPS
3%	Lowest 5-second average	81%
Serious	Hottest state reported	Nominal

The devices

Nothing Phone (3a) Lite	Measure	Xiaomi Pad 6
Android	Platform	Android
–	Chip	–
–	GPU	–
Android 16	OS	Android 14

Nothing Phone (3a) Lite Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5% vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5% Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 13 mini73.0% vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5% iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7% vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5% iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load iPad (9th generation)76.9% vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5% iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store