THERMOHAMMER Get the app

Xiaomi Mi 10T vs Xiaomi Pad 6

Android

Xiaomi Mi 10T

77.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

77.9% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, Xiaomi Mi 10T 77.9%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
Xiaomi Mi 10T 77.9% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: Xiaomi Mi 10T against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: Xiaomi Mi 10T against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
Xiaomi Mi 10TMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.07 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
0.85 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
68%Lowest 5-second average81%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

Xiaomi Mi 10TMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 12OSAndroid 14

Xiaomi Mi 10T Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPhone 12 mini78.0% vs Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1177.5% vs Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1577.3% vs Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone XR79.8% vs Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9% iPhone XR holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store