Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
Android
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
33.5%speed held · 30 min · 1 threadVS
Android
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
74.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadXiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
33.5% against 74.7% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro keeps 74.7% of its speed, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 33.5%. The runs used different settings (30 min · 1 thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 30 min · 1 thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 0.51 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.81 GIPS |
| 0.15 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.60 GIPS |
| 18% | Lowest 5-second average | 56% |
| Serious | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 17 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.