Google Pixel 9 vs iPad mini (6th generation)
Android
Google Pixel 9
68.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
iOS
iPad mini (6th generation)
88.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadiPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
68.6% against 88.4% of full speed
Under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation) keeps 88.4% of its speed, Google Pixel 9 68.6%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| Google Pixel 9 | Measure | iPad mini (6th generation) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 0.85 GIPS | Fastest sample | 1.67 GIPS |
| 0.58 GIPS | Second-half average | 1.53 GIPS |
| 58% | Lowest 5-second average | 77% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Fair |
The devices
| Google Pixel 9 | Measure | iPad mini (6th generation) |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | iOS |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 17 | OS | iOS 27.2 |
More matchups
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Google Pixel 572.5%
vs
Google Pixel 968.6%
Google Pixel 5 holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
iPhone 16e73.5%
iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OBLUE A10187.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.