THERMOHAMMER Get the app

Google Pixel 9 vs Xiaomi Pad 6

Android

Google Pixel 9

68.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

68.6% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, Google Pixel 9 68.6%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
Google Pixel 9 68.6% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: Google Pixel 9 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: Google Pixel 9 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
Google Pixel 9MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
0.85 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
0.58 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
58%Lowest 5-second average81%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

Google Pixel 9MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 17OSAndroid 14

Google Pixel 9 Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

Google Pixel 968.6% vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well Google Pixel 572.5% vs Google Pixel 968.6% Google Pixel 5 holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 968.6% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 968.6% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store