THERMOHAMMER Get the app

HONOR 600 Pro vs Xiaomi Pad 6

Android

HONOR 600 Pro

Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750) · Adreno 830

56.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

56.4% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, HONOR 600 Pro 56.4%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
HONOR 600 Pro 56.4% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: HONOR 600 Pro against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: HONOR 600 Pro against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
HONOR 600 ProMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.65 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
0.93 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
44%Lowest 5-second average81%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

HONOR 600 ProMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
AndroidPlatformAndroid
Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750)Chip–
Adreno 830GPU–
Android 17OSAndroid 14

HONOR 600 Pro Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

HONOR 600 Pro49,080 vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322 HONOR 600 Pro scores 22% higher overall HONOR 600 Pro49,080 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132 HONOR 600 Pro scores 44% higher overall HONOR 600 Pro49,080 vs Xiaomi 17T23,022 HONOR 600 Pro scores 113% higher overall HONOR 600 Pro49,080 vs PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF)134,594 PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF) scores 174% higher overall HONOR 600 Pro56.4% vs iPhone 11 Pro55.7% HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load HONOR 600 Pro56.4% vs HONOR 9049.2% HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store