HONOR 600 Pro vs Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G
Android
HONOR 600 Pro
Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750) · Adreno 830
56.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G
82.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadXiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G holds its speed better under sustained load
56.4% against 82.3% of full speed
Under sustained load
Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G keeps 82.3% of its speed, HONOR 600 Pro 56.4%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| HONOR 600 Pro | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 1.65 GIPS | Fastest sample | 1.18 GIPS |
| 0.93 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.97 GIPS |
| 44% | Lowest 5-second average | 79% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| HONOR 600 Pro | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750) | Chip | – |
| Adreno 830 | GPU | – |
| Android 17 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
HONOR 600 Pro scores 22% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
HONOR 600 Pro scores 44% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Xiaomi 17T23,022
HONOR 600 Pro scores 113% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF)134,594
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF) scores 174% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
vs
HONOR 9049.2%
HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.