HONOR 90 vs iPad mini (6th generation)
Android
HONOR 90
49.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
iOS
iPad mini (6th generation)
88.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadiPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
49.2% against 88.4% of full speed
Under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation) keeps 88.4% of its speed, HONOR 90 49.2%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| HONOR 90 | Measure | iPad mini (6th generation) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 4.32 GIPS | Fastest sample | 1.67 GIPS |
| 2.12 GIPS | Second-half average | 1.53 GIPS |
| 39% | Lowest 5-second average | 77% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Fair |
The devices
| HONOR 90 | Measure | iPad mini (6th generation) |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | iOS |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 15 | OS | iOS 27.2 |
More matchups
HONOR 9049.2%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
iPhone 11 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
vs
HONOR 9049.2%
HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
HONOR 9049.2%
Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load
HONOR 9049.2%
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2%
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OBLUE A10187.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.