THERMOHAMMER Get the app

HONOR 90 vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)

Android

HONOR 90

49.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
iOS

iPhone SE (3rd Gen)

74.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load

49.2% against 74.3% of full speed

Under sustained load

iPhone SE (3rd Gen) keeps 74.3% of its speed, HONOR 90 49.2%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
HONOR 90 49.2% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) 74.3%
Throughput over time: HONOR 90 against iPhone SE (3rd Gen)25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: HONOR 90 against iPhone SE (3rd Gen)25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
HONOR 90MeasureiPhone SE (3rd Gen)
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
4.32 GIPSFastest sample1.56 GIPS
2.12 GIPSSecond-half average1.16 GIPS
39%Lowest 5-second average73%
FairHottest state reportedFair

The devices

HONOR 90MeasureiPhone SE (3rd Gen)
AndroidPlatformiOS
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 15OSiOS 27.0

HONOR 90 iPhone SE (3rd Gen)

More matchups

HONOR 9049.2% vs iPhone 11 Pro55.7% iPhone 11 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load HONOR 600 Pro56.4% vs HONOR 9049.2% HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 968.6% vs HONOR 9049.2% Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load HONOR 9049.2% vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2% Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 16e73.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store