THERMOHAMMER Get the app

HONOR 90 vs OBLUE A101

Android

HONOR 90

49.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

OBLUE A101

87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load

49.2% against 87.6% of full speed

Under sustained load

OBLUE A101 keeps 87.6% of its speed, HONOR 90 49.2%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
HONOR 90 49.2% OBLUE A101 87.6%
Throughput over time: HONOR 90 against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: HONOR 90 against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
HONOR 90MeasureOBLUE A101
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
4.32 GIPSFastest sample2.43 GIPS
2.12 GIPSSecond-half average2.11 GIPS
39%Lowest 5-second average80%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

HONOR 90MeasureOBLUE A101
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 15OSAndroid 16

HONOR 90 OBLUE A101

More matchups

HONOR 9049.2% vs iPhone 11 Pro55.7% iPhone 11 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load HONOR 600 Pro56.4% vs HONOR 9049.2% HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 968.6% vs HONOR 9049.2% Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load HONOR 9049.2% vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2% Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store