THERMOHAMMER Get the app

HONOR 90 vs Xiaomi Pad 6

Android

HONOR 90

49.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

49.2% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, HONOR 90 49.2%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
HONOR 90 49.2% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: HONOR 90 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: HONOR 90 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
HONOR 90MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
4.32 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
2.12 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
39%Lowest 5-second average81%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

HONOR 90MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 15OSAndroid 14

HONOR 90 Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

HONOR 9049.2% vs iPhone 11 Pro55.7% iPhone 11 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load HONOR 600 Pro56.4% vs HONOR 9049.2% HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 968.6% vs HONOR 9049.2% Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load HONOR 9049.2% vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2% Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store