iPad (9th generation) vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
iOS
iPad (9th generation)
76.9%speed held · 15 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
74.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadiPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
76.9% against 74.7% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
iPad (9th generation) keeps 76.9% of its speed, Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro 74.7%. The runs used different settings (15 min · multi-thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPad (9th generation) | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 15 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 1.15 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.81 GIPS |
| 0.88 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.60 GIPS |
| 45% | Lowest 5-second average | 56% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPad (9th generation) | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.2 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPhone SE (2nd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)92.2%
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.