THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad (A16) vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

iOS

iPad (A16)

85.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

74.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPad (A16) holds its speed better under sustained load

85.4% against 74.7% of full speed

Under sustained load

iPad (A16) keeps 85.4% of its speed, Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro 74.7%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPad (A16) 85.4% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro 74.7%
Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPad (A16) against Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPad (A16)MeasureXiaomi POCO X7 Pro
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.61 GIPSFastest sample0.81 GIPS
1.38 GIPSSecond-half average0.60 GIPS
82%Lowest 5-second average56%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPad (A16)MeasureXiaomi POCO X7 Pro
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6OSAndroid 16

iPad (A16) Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

More matchups

iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 16 Pro85.5% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well HONOR X7b84.9% vs iPad (A16)85.4% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad (A16)85.4% vs iPad mini (5th generation)84.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 16e73.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store